Registers work
Seals works, declares licences and authorized accounts, funds campaigns, and classifies matches against their own work.
CannotVerify their own ownership, or label a match on someone else's work.
How it works
Sentinel is an evidence and rights workflow, and matching is one stage inside it. Here is what happens at each step, who acts, what gets recorded, and what that record does not mean.

Separation of duties
No single party can carry a case from a match to a payout. The limits below are enforced in code and covered by adversarial tests.
Seals works, declares licences and authorized accounts, funds campaigns, and classifies matches against their own work.
CannotVerify their own ownership, or label a match on someone else's work.
Submits public URLs and evidence while signed in, so any award is attributable.
CannotWin an award on a case where they have a conflict of interest, or approve their own payout.
Works the 13-point checklist on every lead, from scouts and from discovery alike.
CannotSee the reward amount, or send an owner notice without a second approval.
Confirms or denies ownership, classifies the use, reports false positives, and records resolutions.
CannotStand in for the reviewer. Owner actions never write a reviewer finding.
Approves, holds or claws back payouts and resolves appeals with a named decision.
CannotApprove a payout to themselves, or approve one while a hold is in place.
The seven stages
Gated stages glow. A case can stop at any of them, and stopping is recorded like any other outcome.
Creators sign in and request identity verification (in this build, manual staff attestation; no government ID is stored). They upload the original, whether an image, video, audio, text or source file, with their own claimed creation and publication dates. Works can be grouped into catalogs. Creators declare authorized accounts, licensees and permitted uses up front, so reuse they already allow never becomes a lead.
On upload Sentinel seals the file's SHA-256 hash, timestamps and a provenance snapshot. The database itself rejects any update or deletion of a seal. Replacing a file creates a new version with its own seal, and the old seal is untouched. Creators can export a private evidence certificate and work through an informational copyright-registration checklist.
Two sources feed the same pipeline. Sentinel's own discovery collects pages only under a fail-closed source policy with an emergency pause; in this build its only source is a local fixture server. Signed-in scouts submit the public URL of a suspected copy with notes. Private, loopback and cloud-metadata addresses are refused. Duplicate, conflict-of-interest and rules-based fraud checks run before review.
Images are compared with perceptual fingerprints. Video is compared with frame hashes and temporal alignment, and audio with spectral landmark fingerprints that tolerate speed and pitch changes. A region-aware second stage looks for crops, borders, picture-in-picture and split screens. Each signal is scored and shown on its own.
A reviewer with review permission works the same 13-point checklist for discovered and scout-reported cases: is the work distinctive, is the source relationship plausible, is the original itself a repost, is there a known licence, is the proposed message neutral, and more. They advance, reject or ask for more evidence. Advancing requires every check, and every finding is audited. A second, distinct approval is needed before any owner notice goes out.
The probable owner receives a neutral, private notice, never an accusation and never a payment demand, plus a portal. There they confirm or deny ownership, say whether this use was authorized, licensed, unknown or unauthorized, report a false positive, and can record a resolution such as attribution, a licensing offer or a removal request. Saying a use was authorized is an accurate, successful outcome.
If the case is covered by a funded campaign and the first valid scout qualifies, Sentinel computes an award tied to the specific qualifying record. A bounty administrator who is not the scout approves the payout once. Holds pause it, clawbacks reverse it with a named reason, and scouts can appeal to a different person. Donors and funders never influence the review.
Rewards
Amounts are set per campaign. Every award points at the specific human-sourced record that qualified it, so it is always clear why something was paid.
| Award | Qualifying record | Who creates that record | Then |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead reward | Reviewer advance decision | A named reviewer | Separate payout approval |
| Standard reward | Owner-confirmed unauthorized use | The verified owner | Separate payout approval |
| Resolution bonus | Standard award plus an owner-confirmed resolution | The verified owner | Separate payout approval |
Policy: Bounty policy · Payout policy
Evidence records
Sentinel only uses language for the record that actually exists. Accusatory phrases are blocked in outbound messages unless a legal determination is on file for that exact case.
| Label | What it means | Produced by |
|---|---|---|
| AI-detected match | A similarity score and a candidate transformation. Not a conclusion. | The matching pipeline |
| Human-validated lead | A named reviewer checked the match against all 13 checks and advanced it. | A human reviewer |
| Owner-confirmed unauthorized use | The verified owner said this specific use was not authorized. | The probable owner |
| Legally determined infringement | A court or other authoritative process ruled on this case. Rare, and never assumed. | A court or authoritative process |
Reference: Terminology guide
See it run